224 Nistha doctrine of liberation
Niį¹£į¹ha
Åaį¹
karaās doctrine of liberation in the GÄ«tÄ is set out briefly in his introduction: the Highest good ā¦ is from the Course (dharma) of Estab- lishment-in-Knowledge-of-Self (Ätma-jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ), preceded by completely casting off all action (sarva-karma-saį¹nyÄsa). He presents it at length at the end, in the commentary to XVIII.50, 54, and 55, in the following extracts.
XVIII.50
That supreme establishment-in-Knowledge (niį¹£į¹hÄ jƱÄnasya yÄ parÄ niį¹£į¹hÄ) is its final resting-place (pary-avasÄna), its culmination (pari-samÄpti)
That is the supreme culmination of Knowledge of Brahman (brahma-jƱÄnasya yÄ parÄ parisamÄpti).
XVIII. 54 (extract)
Such a man of jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ (establishment-in-Knowledge), My devotee (bhakta) worshipping Me the supreme Lord, has attained the fourth, the highest, devotion (bhakti), that which has Knowledge. As it was said
(VII.18) The fourth class (the class of Knowers) worship Me. So by that bhakti of Knowledge ā
XVIII. 55 (extract)
By devotion he knows Me, how great and who I am in truth:
Then having known Me in truth, he thereupon enters.
(Åaį¹ kara) Then having known Me in truth, he thereupon enters into Me. It is not meant by this that there are two separate actions ā an entering apart from Knowledge. Having known, he thereupon enters means Knowledge alone with no further result. So it was said: Know me as the Knower of the field (XIII.2).
(Opponent) It is a contradiction to what was said previously (XVIII.50) that what is highest is Establishment (niį¹£į¹hÄ) of Knowledge, and by that he knows Me. To explain the contradiction: when the Knowledge of something simply arises in a Knower, then the Knower is said to know that thing. He does not look to some establishment, some going over again, of the knowledge. So the contradiction is, that it was said previously that it is not by knowledge but by Establishment-of-Knowledge (jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ), by going over it again that one knows.
(Answer) There is no contradiction, for the force of the word Establishment (niį¹£į¹hÄ) is, the definite coming-to-rest (avasÄnatva) in Self-being (Ätma-anubhava) of a Knowledge that has met the conditions for its own rise (utpatti) and maturing (paripÄka), (namely) absence of obstacles. That is its Establishment (niį¹£į¹hÄ).
The concomitant conditions for the rise (utpatti) and maturing (paripÄka) of the Knowledge from scripture and instruction of a teacher are: purity of buddhi and so on, the (twenty) qualities beginning with humility (XIII.7ā11). When from them arises the Knowledge that the Field-Knower (kį¹£etra-jƱa) and the highest Self (paramÄtman) are one, and there is also renunciation of all actions tied up with notions of differences of agent, instruments and so on ā when there is thus definite being-the-Self (svÄtma-anubhava) ā that state is what is meant by the highest Establishment-of-Knowledge (jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ).
As against the other three types of devotion (bhakti) given in VII. 16, namely of those in danger, those seeking Knowledge, or those seeking success in the world, this jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ is called the fourth kind of devotion, the highest. By that highest devotion he knows the Lord in truth. Thereupon, the idea (buddhi) of any difference between the Lord and the Knower of the field, completely ceases. So what is being said is: āhe knows Me in truth by the devotion (bhakti) which is Establishment-in-Knowledge (jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ), and there is no contradiction.
(There follow citations of texts showing that giving up all sense of āI doā must come before and along with jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ.)
jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ is unremitting persistence (abhiniveį¹£a) in the idea- stream of the Self Apart. Bhakti-yoga of serving the Lord by oneās proper action has for its perfection this result: becoming capable of jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ. Thus the yoga of bhakti brings about jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ, which has mokį¹£a as its final resting-place (avasÄna). The Lord goes on to praise that yoga in verse 56.
In this short summarizing passage, XVIII.55, Åaį¹ kara twice distinguishes between the rise (utpatti) of Knowledge and its mature (paripĆ£ka) state. Elsewhere he similarly distinguishes Right Vision when it has just arisen (utpanna-samyag-darÅana) from its established state (samyag-darÅana- niį¹£į¹hÄ).
The notion of maturing (paripÄka) involves time, though not a fixed time. Another key word in the passage is avasÄna, which has the sense of a final goal or stage. There is an association with unharnessing horses, or a river finding its bourn in the ocean. He twice refers to the final goal (avasÄna) of Knowledge as anubhava. (A separate note on these terms follows.)
As he says in his commentary to V.12, the final stages are (1) sattva-Åuddhi (purity of essence), (2) jƱÄna-prÄpti (obtaining Knowledge), (3) saį¹nyÄsa giving up āI doā (V.8, and V.13 which is often cited by Åaį¹ kara in the GÄ«tÄ commentary on giving up action), (4) jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ, and (5) mokį¹£a. He calls the whole process krama, meaning a step-by-step progress.
The process of jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ is in fact jƱÄna-yoga, beginning with Knowledge: it is outlined briefly in XVIII 50ā55. Exceptions to the rule of physical renunciation are allowed to ksatriya Knowers (kį¹£aį¹riyÄįø„ vidvÄį¹sÄįø„) and others. They are listed in the section called Exceptions.
JƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ is described in the GÄ«tÄ itself in several places. Åaį¹
kara gives as main ones:
II.55ā72;
V.17ā26
XII. 13ā20
XIV.22ā25
XVIII.51ā54
It is also described shortly in many places. It is concerned not with reinforcing Knowledge, which needs no reinforcement, but with removing obstructions. Such normally arise from prÄrabdha karma. The instruction to jƱÄna-niį¹£į¹hÄ would correspond to an instruction to keep a flowing stream clear, as distinct from creating, or reinforcing, the stream. It is removing any branches that might fall into it, but not pushing the water along, or pouring more in. Normally, some disturbances from prÄrabdha are to be expected, but there might be none. In some places Åaį¹ kara gives the brief statement: ājƱÄna is the means to mokį¹£a.ā For instance there should be no prÄrabdha left at the hour of death: it will have come to an end. Knowledge attained at that time has its fruit instantly: it will have no need to āmatureā. So the final hour (as the GÄ«tÄ and Åaį¹ kara mention) is specifically favourable.